• Home
  • Displaying items by tag: alternative review methods
Monday, 11 December 2017 14:58

Decoupled peer review



Peer review in Peerage of Science consists of four stages. Each stage has a deadline, set by the Authors upon sending their manuscript and displayed to Peers deciding whether to engage as a Reviewer.  

Monday, 11 December 2017 14:54

Post-publication peer review




Monday, 11 December 2017 14:47

Interactive peer review



It is a two-stage publication process. In the first stage, manuscripts that pass a streamlined access-review are immediately typeset and published in the discussion forum in our on-screen format optimized for online reading.  

Monday, 11 December 2017 14:37

Consultative peer review




Wednesday, 22 November 2017 12:58

Final-version commenting


Wednesday, 22 November 2017 12:44

Open participation peer review


Tuesday, 21 November 2017 16:46

Annotating or tagging


Friday, 17 November 2017 12:09

Review applications

These tools contribute to the network-based and collaborative aspect of research by opening up the discussion on already published scientific results. In this way, they can be viewed as post publication review tools. 

Friday, 17 November 2017 12:08

Repository based publishing and review

Repositories can also offer peer review functionalities. By turning repositories into evaluation platforms the quality control of the scholarly communication process is given back to the research communities.  

Page 1 of 2
Unless otherwise indicated, content hosted on OpenUP Hub is licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).