The use of academic profiling sites is becoming more common, and emerging technologies boost researchers’ visibility and exchange of ideas. In our study we compared profiles at five different profiling sites. These five sites are ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID and ORCID.
SHORT DESCRIPTION
Gender diversity has the potential to drive scientific discovery and innovation. In this work, three approaches to gender diversity are described: diversity in research teams, diversity in research methods and diversity in research questions.
SHORT DESCRIPTION
“Publish or perish” is tattooed on the mind of every academic. Like it or loathe it, publishing in high-profile journals is the fast track to positions in prestigious universities with illustrious colleagues and lavish resources, celebrated awards and plentiful grant funding.
SHORT DESCRIPTION
This is an OpenUP deliverable addressign policy issues on gender issues in peer review, impact measurement and dissemination practices. It was submitted on 31 August 2018.
Short Description
This guide provides the backbone for the implementation of gender equality in different research funding and performing organisations across Europe. It starts by listing recommendations for the implementation of appropriate indicators, as well as for measures to avoid bias. It follows by providing further recommendations on how to implement an efficient system to monitor gender equality. Finally, it provides an overview of relevant grant management systems.
- Authors:
Markus Helmer, Manuel Schottdorf, Andreas Neef, Demian Battaglia
Short Description
Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing and it is essential that peer reviewers are appointed on the basis of their expertise alone. However, it is difficult to check for any bias in the peer-review process because the identity of peer reviewers generally remains confidential.
Short Description
Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing and it is essential that peer reviewers are appointed on the basis of their expertise alone. However, it is difficult to check for any bias in the peer-review process because the identity of peer reviewers generally remains confidential.
SHORT DESCRIPTION
This report was produced by the GENDERACTION project to explore the possible intersections between gender and Open Science and Open Innovation. It should be considered as a starting point for stakeholders to reflect on how the two ERA priorities may create reinforcing synergies. The report also underscores the need for further studies and analyses. It was submitted on 31 January 2019.